The Best Things in Life Are Free

August 19th, 2009

The Chicago Dancing Festival easily counts as one of the best things in life. With four free performances in five days, it’s the best week of the year for cash-strapped dance enthusiasts.

The first program, on Tuesday, August 18, was titled New Voices. It featured works by what the program calls “a hot new generation of choreographers” at the Harris Theater for Music and Dance in Millennium Park.

The evening opened with the Richmond Ballet making their Chicago debut with “To Familiar Spaces in Dream,” choreographed by Jessica Lang. For the first full minute at least, three couples danced in unison to music by Philip Glass. After they established a rhythm of pleasant monotony, it felt exciting when one couple brok away from the other two. From there the work evolved into a complicated piece involving the manipulation of white rectangular props of varying sizes to different musical movements by Craig Armstrong and John Cage. The props served as backdrops, supports, and surfaces to stand, walk, and lie on. The dancers doubled as stage hands, carting the rectangles–and each other–into different formations. Sometimes Lang’s choreography seemed to grow out of pure curiosity, exploring what could be done with, around, and on the props, and the dancers looked like extremely graceful children playing with building blocks. In one musical movement, slow, intense motion and sharp contractions were filled with sadness. But the work never developed a story or emotional theme and, overall, remained an exciting, abstract exploration of space and shape.

River North Chicago Dance Company started the second piece, “Train,” at a slow burn that quickly exploded on the stage. Choreogrpaher Robert Battle paired percussive music by Les Tambours du Bronx with manic dancing punctuated by moments of pause. In pointed contrast to Richmond Ballet’s waif-like ballerinas, the five women on stage were sturdy enough to take the beating given them by the pounding musical score that drove them to dance like madwomen and hurl themselves to the floor. This might sound like a choreographic mess, but though choreography cycled through flailing, leaping, and collapsing movements, it was performed with such recognizable skill and technique that the result was precise and powerful. Despite the speed of the movement, it was easy–and fun–to follow. A solo by one of the five women stood out as particularly fierce, and completely in control, dancing.

Oregon Ballet Theatre‘s “Just,” choreographed by Trey McIntyre, might have been called “Just Okay,” quipped one audienc member. Not because it wasn’t good, but because it followed such fierce competition. The contemporary ballet was performed on a spare stage in white costumes to violin and piano music. There wasn’t much variation in pace, which made the work seem stale in comparison to the previous two works, which contained so much variety.

Aszure Barton & Artists performed “Ah! Crudel” to a Handel opera sung by Renee Fleming. Dancers Cherice Barton and James Gregg sat across from each other at a square black table and performed a negotiation to the rises, falls, and tremulations of Fleming’s voice. First Barton slapped her hands on the table and climbed onto it, gaining the upper hand. Then Gregg rose from his chair and asserted himself. In one memorable moment, Barton captivated Gregg–and the whole audience–by slowly finger-walking her hand across the table. The smallest movements of her dexterous fingers were visible from the farthest seats in the house.

The final work of the evening, “Age of Innocence,” choreographed by Edwaard Liang and performed by the Joffrey Ballet, started with a crowd of 16 dancers on the small Harris Theater stage. The brilliance of the choreography of this contemporary ballet became apparent during the first pas de deux, between Megan Quiroz and Thomas Nicholas. However, Quiroz’s hyperextended knees partially detracted from the beaty of the movement for me. Some people like the line created by hyperextension, but I think it only makes for an uglier S-shaped line. The second pas de deux paired graceful giant Fabrice Calmels with a little bendy straw of a ballerina, Victoria Jaiani. Calmels was a little clumsy getting to and dancing on the floor, but the two were an excellent partnership. They were the perfect pair of strength and grace, leading to some spectacular sequences of lifts and carries.

I left the Harris Theater awed that I had attended a concert of this caliber for free. This accessibility to great art–and new artists–is a testament to the arts city that Chicago is.

Not Quite the Time of My Life

January 24th, 2009

Dirty Dancing, the musical, is tailor-made for product marketing. That was my first impression, when I walked into the lobby of Chicago’s Cadillac Palace Theatre and saw not one, but two kiosks hawking tank tops with fan-favorite quotes like, “I carried a watermelon,” and pink hot pants with Dirty Dancing scrawled across the seat. If I were a teeanager, I would have been all over those.

But, if I were a teenager, I wouldn’t know the 1987 movie by heart. And that is the crux of the issue I had with the production, which closed in Chicago last week and opens in Boston in February.

The TV spot above is typical of the marketing effort, which was geared toward people like me, who saw it first as a young girl and became lifelong fans. But the show catered to those who didn’t know it well, with such a devotion to including every plot point, that many scenes felt rushed. The recreation of the scene where Johnny and Baby practice the lift in the river, which involved fluid blue silk in front of a watery video screen image, came off as just plain silly. A scene like that, which just didn’t work, even on an impressively adjustable rotating hydraulic stage, would have been an obvious one to cut.

I would rather have seen writer Eleanor Bergstein and director James Powell honor the film by transforming the best elements of the movie — the high-energy dancing, the  love story, and the well-to-do-family’s emotional journey from talking about social consciousness to acting on it — into something new. The show felt like a missed chance to take advantage of the stage and the live audience.

Now, I love this movie, so a near-exact replication of it on stage was still fun to watch, especially in the company of three Dirty Dancing-quoting girlfriends. But, I was not, as I expected to be, enchanted with the story in a new way.

Silly Photo #1

January 10th, 2009

I first documented my penchant for taking silly travel photos in an article for the travel e-zine Galavanting. As I noted in the article (which the editors oddly framed as a service piece) “Budget Souvenirs: Silly Photos Around the World,” my big brother was my inspiration.

From the time I was able to hike without assistance (age two, according to my mom), my family’s favorite vacation spot was DeSoto State Park, about 100 miles northeast of our home in Birmingham, Alabama. We never visited without driving to a lookout over Little River Canyon, and that’s where my brother started it all with this picture.

first_fake_fall

A Slam on Dance Chicago’s Dance Slam

November 23rd, 2008

“Did I miss something in the event description?” my friend asked as we walked through the Athenaeum Theatre lobby, which was populated by teenage girls in sparkly dance costumes. She asked me three more times that night.

I chose Dance Slam, on November 19, as the sole performance to attend in the month-long Dance Chicago festival at the Athenaeum Theatre based on two factors:

  1. The price. At $15, it was the least expensive ticket
  2. The format of more than 20 back-to-back five-minute-or-less pieces with audience interaction via voting. I thought this unusual format signaled a night of innovative, perhaps even experimental, dance.

Instead, it was a kids’ dance recital. When the first couple of groups were middle and high school aged girls with dance skill levels to match, I thought the schedule might start with young amateurs and work its way up to the more experimental professional works. But I had no way of knowing. You see, they were out of programs when we arrived five minutes before curtain time. And that innovative voting element I was so intrigued by? Turned out the programs were also paper ballots, and scores were tallied after the show. With no program, I had no vote. And by intermission I had lost my will to vote.

Just before we snuck out a little more than halfway through the program, my friend pointed out that we were probably the only two people there who were not related to somebody on stage. We couldn’t help but notice that certain sections of the audience were cheering loudly only for certain performances. If that wasn’t evidence enough, they were yelling out the names of their loved ones—not something you hear at a professional dance concert.

To be fair, there were a couple of entertaining and well-choreographed pieces, like Bollingbrook Park District Danceforce’s Recess, which featured kids who looked between 10 and 12 stomping the schoolyard with impressive hip hop moves and backpack tricks. But I’ve got a bone to pick with Dance Chicago: Your description of an evening featuring “young up-and-coming dancers” was a little (okay, a lot) misleading. Had I known, I would have opted to pay $25 for a professional show, rather than $15 to watch kids I don’t know.

Talk.in’s Second Wave

November 18th, 2008

A symphony of cell phone shut-down jingles signaled taping was about to start. I was among a capacity crowd of about 250 at The SPACE, in Evanston, Illinois, for the recording of the first installment of Talk.in, a new radio show produced by Women’s Media Group.

Well, it’s sort of new. The original Talk-In aired in the 1970s on Chicago’s WBEZ public radio station. Its host was Maya Friedler, an actress, radio producer, and second wave femenist. (The first wave was the suffragists who agitated for the right to vote.) Friedler is now the founder of WMG.

The feature event was a panel discussion between novelist Sara Paretsky, historian June Sochen, and Women’s Business Development Center founder Hedy Ratner, all women from the second-wave generation of feminism.

I’m in the third-wave generation of feminism, I learned that evening. Among the things I’ve had the luxury of taking for granted is that waves of feminism have been defined. I’ve thought of feminism as a social constant rather than a series of waves. And yet those who were adults when the second wave was born are not relics of the past. They were sitting on a stage in front of me looking as vibrant as I am while explaining that they grew up in a world without the word “feminism.”

Despite our different upbringings, their views of what feminism is and what it seeks to accomplish are the same as mine. Being a feminist doesn’t mean being a bitch or a man-hater. It doesn’t mean being bitter or militant or masculine. It simply means you believe that women fully qualify as worthy human beings and deserve equal rights and opportunities. (During the end-of-evening Q&A session one audience member asked, “Why do we need a word for the concept that women’s rights are human rights?” Yes, it’s sad, but we still do.)

Another integral element of feminism is giving equal recognition to the contributions women have made (and continue to make) to our society. On this point Paretsky sounded an alarm to the audience, saying, “We run the risk in every generation of women just disappearing from the picture.

What I took from the evening was a call to be a more conscious feminist. Rather than take for granted its constancy, I’m more aware that feminism is a wave, and that I must help keep up its momentum.

Serendipity in Ecuador

November 15th, 2008

One serendipitous moment–the kind no travel brochure would dare to promise–can make a trip. In the Galapagos Islands last month, our surprise was literally huge.

My husband was among a group of three snorkelers from our 17-passenger cruise who ventured to a cove on Bartolome Island. Heads down in the water, they approached what seemed to be a rock outcropping. But when they lifted their heads, they saw water shoot up from a blowhole in the gray mass. It was a beached bryde whale.   

Beached bryde whale

The snorkelers informed our two naturalist guides, who immediately loaded the rest of us onto two pangas (motorized inflatable rafts) and drove us to the whale’s cove. Floating within feet of the animal, we could clearly see deep, red gashes on its partially exposed back. Our guides assessed the whale’s condition. It was alive and breathing, but injured.

One hour later, we were back on our boat, anchored a couple hundred feet offshore, while our captain led a rescue crew of seven men in four pangas with two ropes. All 17 of us stood on the top deck to watch the action through binoculars.

They were too far away to hear us, but we cheered when we saw that the dorsel fin was moving away from the beach behind the pangas. We yelled directions and encouragement as the crew removed the ropes and the whale began to swim: “Turn right, RIGHT!!” “Swim the other way, you can do it!”

We sighed heavily as the whale ignored our directions and swam slowly, exhaustedly back toward shore. There was nothing more for the men in the pangas to do. They returned to the boat, and we departed for a refueling stop, about an hour behind schedule.

Happily, there is an epilogue to this story. A cruisemate emailed us about a week after we returned home. Back in Quito he had run into a man who had been on a cruise that visited Bartolome Island later on the same day. The man and his cruisemates watched a crew of Galapagos Islands park rangers pull a bryde whale out of a shallow rocky cove. When the rangers released it, the whale swam out to sea.

Ecuador: Go for the islands, stay for the mainland

November 4th, 2008

The Galapagos Islands first attracted my husband and me to Ecuador. In my mind they were a mythical place where the animals were so extraordinary that they singlehandedly gave rise to the theory of evolution. (Turns out this isn’t exactly true. Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species a full 24 years after visiting the islands, and the book mentions them fewer times than one would imagine given how largely they figure in the modern Darwin legend. It seems that the Galapagos planted a seed in Darwin’s mind that gradually grew into natural selection, rather than causing the idea to spring fully formed from his head the moment he set foot on the archipelago’s volcanic soil. But I digress.)

In researching the country to plan our Galapagos excursion, I discovered that mainland Ecuador has a wealth of destinations worth seeing. So many, in fact, that we couldn’t include them all. I decided to concentrate on the Andes region. In talking to a friend who once lived in the country and travelers we met along the way, I realized that as much as we enjoyed each place we went, we missed out on equally worthy destinations. When we return to Ecuador, it will not be to revisit the Galapagos Islands, but to see even more of the mainland:

QuitoWhile Quito (right), the capital city, has an impressive colonial historic district, Cuenca, I’ve been assured, is a much more charming colonial town. And while Quito also has thriving modern businesses and a restaurant and nightlife scene, Guayaquil, the country’s largest city, is called the soul of modern Ecuador.

 

CotopaxiThe dirt road that tops out at almost 14,800 feet on Cotopaxi (left)  allowed us to to achieve a new personal altitude record with a bumpy car ride followed by a 1,000-foot hike to the climbers’ hut at the edge of volcano’s glacial cap. But had we taken the time to travel to the more remote Chimborazo, we could have bragged that we hiked on the tallest volcano in the Andes (perhaps even the highest spot in the world).

 

Rio Negro

We thoroughly enjoyed our downhill bike ride from the Andean town of Baños to tropical Rio Negro (right), but having only reached the edge of the Amazon basin, we didn’t really experience that region at all, I learned from some fellow Galapagos cruise passengers. They had amazing tales of navigating the Amazon River in canoes and listening to their guides recount legends of the mythical creatures of the rainforest.

Ecuador, aqui vamos!

October 15th, 2008

I’ve spent months planning a two-and-a-half-week trip to Ecuador, and the departure date has finally arrived. I think of the trip as having four distinct parts, because we’re visiting four locations where we’ll participate in different activities that each require specific clothes. It’s made packing difficult.

Here is an overview of our planned trip:

PHASE 1: QUITO

Our trip begins in Quito (9,300 feet elevation), the capital of Ecuador. This city in north central Ecuador sits in an Andean valley between volcanic peaks. We’ll spend much of our time in the historic district, a UNESCO World Heritage Site with indigenous architecture and ancient churches and monasteries. Before we leave, we’ll take a day trip north to La Mitad del Mundo, literally “the middle of the world.” Here, a stone monument marks the equator.

           

PHASE 2: COTOPAXI

We’ll travel by bus down the Avenue of the Volcanoes to a small B&B just outside Cotopaxi National Park. Round, snowcapped Cotopaxi (19,347 feet tall) is considered the prettiest volcano in the country, and we’ll climb up to the camp from which all peak attempts are staged. The climbers’ hut sits at a breathtaking 15,750 feet, which will set a new personal altitude record for us.

 

PHASE 3: BAÑOS

Traveling southeast, we’ll reach Baños at the edge of the Andean high country. This town, with natural hot springs set amid lush green mountains, is a popular vacation destination for Ecuadorians and foreigners alike. One day, we’ll take a 30-mile bike ride, passing through climate zones as we descend to Puyo, a town in the Amazon basin. In Puyo, we can load our bikes onto a bus and have a much easier ride back up to Baños.

 

PHASE 4: GALAPAGOS ISLANDS

The Galapagos Islands are about as far from the coast of Ecuador as the Hawaiian Islands are from California. We’ll fly to Isla San Cristóbal, one of the easternmost islands, and board a 20-passenger yacht that will be our home for a week. Each night, our boat will travel from one island to another, and each day we’ll explore, guided by the Ecuadorian naturalists who travel with us. Highlights will include snorkeling among sea lions off Isla Española, reading 19th-century explorers’ graffiti on the cliffs of Isla Isabela, and photographing the unique wildlife, including blue-footed boobies, Galapagos penguins, marine iguanas, and giant tortoises.

At the Charles Darwin Research Station on Isla Santa Cruz, we’ll visit the facility’s most famous inhabitant, who recently made international headlines. Lonesome George, a giant tortoise from Isla Pinta, is believed to be the last of his kind. Since being moved to the Research Station in 1972, George has shown little interest in the female tortoises he has been introduced to in the hopes that his offspring can one day repopulate Isla Pinta. But this summer, two clutches of eggs were discovered in his pen. We’ll get to learn firsthand of the status of Lonesome George’s progeny.

Thank you, Mr. King

September 21st, 2008

A few days ago, I called a northwest Louisiana Holiday Inn. I asked for a room under an assumed name. The phone range once, then a deep voice answered.

“Is this B.B. King?” I asked.

“Yes it is,” he answered.

This interview came in the course of writing an article about the new B.B. King Museum and Delta Interpretive Center in Indianola, Mississippi. All interviews make me a little bit nervous. But interviewing somebody with Mr. King’s talent and name recognition made me especially so. His publicist and the communications director at the museum had both mentioned how friendly he is. But still, I worried, it’s their jobs to portray him in a positive light. And I was interrupting the 83-year-old music legend during what was probably a restful afternoon before his evening show.

At the end of our conversation, Mr. King actually thanked me for my time. Twice. It’s not that I expected a pompous attitude, but I was surprised by such a genuine expression of gratitude. He is an international superstar, and I am just one among millions of journalists looking for good stories to tell. There is no reason he should have recognized my name or the name of my publication. But he seemed to genuinely appreciate my taking an interest in him enough to call, enough to want to quote him. I think it’s safe to predict that I will never be to writing what B.B. King is to the blues. But I hope I can be as kind as he is.

Dreams of Chicago

September 8th, 2008

Tonight has been nonstop rain, and it’s cool for summer. I was planning to go to Steppenwolf Theatre’s Dreams of Chicago, part of Blockbuster Week in Millennium Park, with a group of seven girls. But he group voted to bag the show in favor of drinks and appetizers in a cozy tavern across the street from the park.

I was still curious, so after drinks, I walked to Pritzker Pavilion alone. A small group of people sat huddled in jackets and ponchos in the first six rows, where the metal overhang kept the seats mostly dry. I sat down in the third row just as a song ended and a dramatic reading began. It was the monologue of a job seeker who hung out at the Art Institute between interviews for escape and solace. The character spoke of the paintings becoming his friends.

I couldn’t help identifying with the character. The interesting thing about living in a period of instability is that instead of wanting to escape from the usual to something exciting, one looks for an escape to something that is familiar and friendly and constant. This character found that at the Art Institute. My favorite place to find it is in a seat, looking up at a stage, one of a sea of people asking for something amazing.